Leasing Illustrated
October 2012
Issue #9

Forward to
a Friend

Sign up for
this Newsletter

See our

Madison Park

In this newsletter we take a look at the real estate leasing side of the ongoing debate about sustainability and the value of going "green".

If you end up the tenant under a "green lease", make sure to cover our six suggestions set forth below to ensure that the terms are equitable.

Alan Katz
Mintz & Gold LLP 


It Ain't Easy Being Green


Lately, it seems that everyone wants to call their product or service "green" or "organic".

There are even "green wars", with some people pushing the importance of organic products, while others lash out at "greenwashing" (i.e., the deceptive use of green marketing). My favorite take on this is probably the Grocery Store Wars pitting organic Cuke Skywalker and Obe Won Cannoli against the evil empire of processed food.

Maybe we should get in on the act. After all, Mintz & Gold's legal services are pesticide free and contain no artificial flavors. And as our regular readers may have suspected, this newsletter was made with 100% recycled ideas (and humor).

And now, concerns with climate change, energy costs, carbon footprints and corporate image have even brought green to leasing.

Although the term is often bandied about, what exactly is a green lease?

A green lease obligates the landlord and tenant to use the applicable property in the most efficient or sustainable manner.

This sustainability can be achieved through, among other things, particular materials, efficient operating systems, design, location (e.g., near mass transit), term (longer terms mean less moves), landscaping and even availability of sunlight for solar energy.

There are also various organizations that have developed green rating systems for buildings, such as LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), and to measure the efficiency of building equipment and how well it is operated, such as the DOE's Energy Star benchmarking system.

A green lease can benefit tenants through reduced expenses, increased productivity and health of employees and zoning, tax and other financial incentives, as well as improved corporate image. Landlords also receive these benefits, as well as enhanced marketability, increased rents and potentially increased building value.

This sounds like a situation with the potential to benefit both parties, but unfortunately the negotiation often gets stalled on the allocation of expenses.

Bob Meier, an Engineer and Certified Energy Manager, explains that the reason for this is that the structure of many leases provide a "split incentive", i.e., the party obtaining the benefit is not always the party that bears the cost.

With a net lease (and most retail leases), the tenant is typically paying all of the operating expenses other than capital items, so the landlord has little incentive to incur the costs of installing energy efficiencies.

In a gross lease, the tenant is only responsible for increases over a base amount and, in multi-tenant buildings, typically controls only a portion of the space, so it has less incentive to cooperate in reducing consumption. This is particularly true if the escalation clause is not tied to operating expenses (e.g. with a CPI escalation), but the lease allows the inclusion of some portion of capital expenditures, since the landlord would be spreading the cost to its tenants but the tenant would not benefit from any savings.

Yet even in a gross lease incentives can be reversed, for example if a tenant is obligated to pay increases in building wide operating expenses (excluding capital items), then the landlord would pay for the cost of implementing energy efficiencies and the tenant would obtain the benefit of reduced expenses.

As green buildings and leases become more prevalent, landlords will seek to realize "green benefits", particularly in new buildings, but in conversions of older building stock as well. Recently, we have encountered gross leases in existing buildings with landlords trying to pass along to tenants "green operating expenses", including atypical capital costs.

Remain open to the possible mutual advantages for you and your landlord with a green lease (whether in a new building or conversion), but be wary of hidden costs by focusing on the following six points that we developed with the help of Bob Meier:
  • Avoid being on the short end of a "split incentive". Understand the flow of funds so that any energy efficiency initiatives do not arise strictly at your expense. This understanding will allow you to take advantage of the many benefits that can result from these initiatives.
  • Limit your annual cost for capital improvements. If you do agree to share in capital costs to reduce operating expenses, include the customary limitation that the annual cost of such capital improvement be amortized and not exceed the amount of actual savings.
  • Minimize the downside of green covenants. Such covenants govern tenants' conduct (and provide the landlord with benefits in terms of various rating systems), e.g., with respect to the initial build out, future alterations, use and maintenance, operating expenses and rules and regulations, in an attempt to reduce energy consumption, minimize waste and allow for data collection.
    • Failure to comply could lead to a tenant default so provide language indicating that tenant "will endeavor to" meet these standards as goals.
    • Provide "safe-harbor" categories for allowed activities without the landlords' consent.
    • Whether a covenant or a goal, you should be afforded notice and ample opportunity to cure and only repeated violations should be deemed problematic.
    • Make the landlord's remedies result in a lesser penalty than a default, such as a modest liquidated damages "fine", or landlord cure rights, or have initial failures to comply act as triggers for conversation.
    • Specifically exclude consequential damages that could result from a loss of the landlord's tax credits, tax abatement, loan commitment etc. and exclude green covenants from the lease indemnity.
  • Resist the use of existing lease covenants to create unintended green covenants. Landlords cannot unilaterally rewrite lease clauses to incorporate new covenants, even with the best of intentions (watch out for changes through the rules and regulations).
  • Consider imposing green covenants on the landlord. Major national tenants are starting to impose green covenants of their own on their landlords.
  • Consult with an industry expert during the lease negotiations. We always counsel our clients to obtain independent experts to advise and work with us with respect to the drafting of the technical and construction aspects of a lease. This is particularly important as you try to obtain a fair outcome regarding cutting edge technologies such as energy efficiency.
As that well known real estate attorney Kermit the Frog would say, "it ain't easy being green". At least if you follow some of the suggestions above, being green in terms of your lease will not turn out to be too difficult.

Industry Expert


Mintz & Gold would like to thank Bob Meier for his assistance with this month's newsletter. Mr. Meier is a registered Professional Engineer and Certified Energy Manager with 23 years of engineering and management experience. In addition to energy efficiency, his expertise includes negotiation of electricity and natural gas contracts and designing corporate sustainability programs. Mr. Meier is President of the New York Association of Energy Engineers (AEE-NY) and serves on the Board of Directors for the New York Energy Consumers Council (NYECC). He also has a deadly jump shot, which I learned over many years the hard way.

About Us


Mintz & Gold prides itself on providing the highest quality legal representation often associated with large law firms with the attention and reasonable costs of a smaller law firm.  Mintz & Gold's Real Estate Department has a national practice specializing in a broad range of commercial real estate law, with a particular focus on commercial leasing. We have extensive experience with respect to office, retail and shopping center leasing, and have represented major Manhattan landlords, national and multinational institutional tenants and national retail chains. Most of our attorneys practiced for many years at large institutional law firms before joining Mintz & Gold.

For more information regarding Mintz & Gold's real estate practice, click here.

For a list of representative transactions of Mintz & Gold's real estate group, click here.

For Mintz & Gold's website, click here.

Alan Katz
Telephone: (212) 696-4848
Fax: (212) 696-1231

You are receiving this newsletter because you signed up to receive it
or are a client, a friend or have worked with us on a prior transaction.
To ensure that you continue to receive emails from us, please add
katz@mintzandgold.com to your address book today.

To subscribe to this newsletter,
send an email with your request to: katznewsletter@mintzandgold.com

Mintz & Gold respects your privacy.
We do not sell, rent, or share your information with anybody,
and will only use your contact data to provide this newsletter.


This newsletter has been prepared for general information purposes only, and is provided with the understanding and subject to the user's agreement that it does not constitute the rendering of legal advice or other professional advice by Mintz & Gold LLP, and does not create any attorney-client or other special relationship. The content of this newsletter may be considered advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. You should not rely upon this newsletter without seeking legal advice from an attorney licensed in the relevant jurisdiction(s). THE CONTENT OF THIS NEWSLETTER IS PROVIDED AS-IS WITH NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. Additionally, the information contained in this newsletter does not constitute tax advice. Any discussion of tax matters contained in this newsletter is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter.

Copyright © 2012 Alan Katz. All rights reserved.

You may reproduce this article by including this copyright and, if reproducing it electronically,
including a link to www.mintzandgold.com.

Newsletter developed by Blue Penguin Development.

No attorneys were harmed in the production of this newsletter.