Tenant Leasing Illustrated
May 2013
Issue #16

Forward to
a Friend

Sign up for
this Newsletter

See our

Madison Park

Many clients voice the often valid complaint that lawyers get too bogged down in details and definitions. In our profession's defense, however, there are many instances where a failure to focus on the details and definitions can be very costly during the term of your lease.

In today's newsletter, we suggest four ways that focusing on the nitty gritty of your assignment and subletting provision can be crucial for a multi-tiered tenant.

Alan Katz
Mintz & Gold LLP 


Fire Breathing Assignment and Subletting Clauses


It looks like spring is here in the Northeast. Which means all good commercial real estate attorneys are unleashing their dragons, unsheathing their swords and getting in touch with their inner direwolf.

That's right. Spring also means season three of A Game of Thrones, the HBO television drama.

I admit I am hooked, as are many of our readers, since we received more email for our prior Game of Thrones edition than any other (curiously, even more than the breath taking issue on operating expense escalations; imagine that!).

My favorite take on the series is from Saturday Night Live, where the "creative genius" behind the show is revealed to be a 13-year old boy whose suggestion for each scene involves more nudity.

My 17-year old son, Noah, introduced me to the series. But Noah has grown impatient with my inability to use proper G.O.T. terminology and general sloppiness in identifying characters ("you know, the bearded guy who chopped off the head of the zombie guy...").

So Noah has shamed me into reading the Song of Ice and Fire books, by George R.R. Martin, on which the series is based. Yes, sad but true; I need remedial Game of Thrones review.

What does this have to do with leasing? I have no idea; but I had to get your attention.

Seriously, careful attention to terminology and definitions is always important in leases. Recently, we have seen that it is of particular importance under assignment and subletting provisions for multi-tiered tenants.

By multi-tiered tenant, we mean a tenant entity where all or substantially all of its stock or other equity interests is owned by another entity, and perhaps that parent entity is similarly owned by one or more other entities.

As we have discussed in past newsletters, almost all leases restrict the rights of tenants to assign and sublease, including restrictions on transfers of the tenant's equity interests if intended to sidestep the assignment and subleasing restrictions, but tenants need the ability, without landlord's consent, to undertake legitimate business transactions.

Surprisingly, we have found that under some leases changes in control in upper tier entities are prohibited (to avoid tenant transfers designed to circumvent the assignment and subletting restrictions of the lease), but the right for such upper tier entity to transfer the stock or assets of the tenant entity as part of a legitimate corporate transaction or sale is not clearly permitted, even when the parties' intent at the time the lease was negotiated was to address this concern.

The result can be ambiguity as to whether or not the landlord's consent is required (never a good thing).

Keep the following four suggestions in mind with respect to assignment and subletting for multi-tiered entities:
  • Always permit, without the consent of the landlord, transfers to an affiliated entity and to a financially sound entity created by merger, reorganization or recapitalization of your entity or a financially sound purchaser of all or substantially all of your assets or stock. This may be assignment and subletting 101, but this is the basic building block necessary to create the appropriate flexibility for any tenant, multi-tiered or otherwise, and some leases (albeit a minority) do not cover this basic tenant need.
  • When creating flexibility for multi-tiered tenants, make sure that the solution directly addresses the lease's prohibition. This is where careful attention to terminology comes into play. Some leases specifically state that a change in control of a tenant's parent entity is prohibited, but attempt to provide the needed flexibility by excluding from the requirement for landlord's consent an assignment to a successor entity purchasing the tenant's business. But if the change in control occurs at an upper tier level, the actual tenant entity does not change and there will be no assignment. In other words, the exclusion from the requirement of obtaining the landlord's consent does not match up with the prohibition which requires such consent in the first place.

    One way to avoid this problem is for the lease to specifically define changes in control of upper tier entities as "assignments", so that the exclusion matches up with the prohibition.
  • Make Noah proud and focus on the definitions as follows:
  • Make the restrictions requiring landlord's consent as narrow as possible. If the lease provides that "transfers", including changes in control, require landlord's consent, then specifically exclude from the definition of transfers changes in control as part of a legitimate transfer of your business or transaction with a related entity.
  • Make the exclusions from landlord's consent as broad as possible. This exclusion should cover more than just the typical assignments as part of mergers and sales and subleases to related entities. Cover any reorganization, sale of a division, spin off or splitting of your entity and any transfers, "directly or indirectly", i.e. at any level of your entity.
  • For the most comprehensive approach, allow the freedom to transfer without the landlord's consent with respect to any "Change in Control Event". In addition to the typical rights to transfer without consent in the event of mergers, consolidations and sales and to related entities, the best way to protect a multi-tiered tenant is to create a broad category of transactions encompassing all bona fide changes in control. This should not be objectionable to a sophisticated landlord and should be defined as a transfer for a legitimate business purpose, however accomplished, which results in a change in control.
I must admit that I have moved up from the back of the class and now have a certain strut in my step as I show off my knowledge of dragons, Whitewalkers and other minutia of the seven kingdoms of A Game of Thrones. Use the four suggestions above and you can avoid Noah's wrath and maybe even the need for remedial assignment and subletting work for multi-tiered tenants.

About Us


Mintz & Gold prides itself on providing the highest quality legal representation often associated with large law firms with the attention and reasonable costs of a smaller law firm.  Mintz & Gold's Real Estate Department has a national practice specializing in a broad range of commercial real estate law, with a particular focus on commercial leasing. We have extensive experience with respect to office, retail and shopping center leasing, and have represented major Manhattan landlords, national and multinational institutional tenants and national retail chains. Most of our attorneys practiced for many years at large institutional law firms before joining Mintz & Gold.

For more information regarding Mintz & Gold's real estate practice, click here.

For a list of representative transactions of Mintz & Gold's real estate group, click here.

For Mintz & Gold's website, click here.

Alan Katz
Telephone: (212) 696-4848
Fax: (212) 696-1231

You are receiving this newsletter because you signed up to receive it
or are a client, a friend or have worked with us on a prior transaction.
To ensure that you continue to receive emails from us, please add
katz@mintzandgold.com to your address book today.

To subscribe to this newsletter,
send an email with your request to: katznewsletter@mintzandgold.com

Mintz & Gold respects your privacy.
We do not sell, rent, or share your information with anybody,
and will only use your contact data to provide this newsletter.


This newsletter has been prepared for general information purposes only, and is provided with the understanding and subject to the user's agreement that it does not constitute the rendering of legal advice or other professional advice by Mintz & Gold LLP, and does not create any attorney-client or other special relationship. The content of this newsletter may be considered advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. You should not rely upon this newsletter without seeking legal advice from an attorney licensed in the relevant jurisdiction(s). THE CONTENT OF THIS NEWSLETTER IS PROVIDED AS-IS WITH NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. Additionally, the information contained in this newsletter does not constitute tax advice. Any discussion of tax matters contained in this newsletter is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter.

Copyright © 2013 Alan Katz. All rights reserved.

You may reproduce this article by including this copyright and, if reproducing it electronically,
including a link to www.mintzandgold.com.

Newsletter developed by Blue Penguin Development.

No attorneys were harmed in the production of this newsletter.