Tenant Leasing Illustrated
September 2013
Issue #20

Forward to
a Friend

Sign up for
this Newsletter

See our

Madison Park

Although one of our familiar mantras is that tenants must always preserve the unfettered right to assign or sublet in connection with a sale of its business, restaurant leases present particular challenges.

In today's newsletter, we suggest six approaches to follow in today's market where landlords have been looking for greater control regarding the operators of their retail restaurant spaces.

Alan Katz
Mintz & Gold LLP 


Lease On A Hot Tin Roof


Mendacity, mendacity, mendacity.

It seems lately like everyone is telling us stories and we are all stuck in a Tennessee Williams play ("there ain't nothin' more powerful than the odor of mendacity...").

We have candidates running for New York City Mayor and Comptroller who keep the tabloid headline writers hopping. We have Lance Armstrong losing all of his Tour de France medals. We have Major League Baseball suspending 13 players, including Ryan Braun who just recently insisted upon his innocence. We have A Rod being A Rod.

The natural first question is, why is it that when any of my Mets use steroids they still only hit .180 (see, Jordany Valdespin)? They should get their money back! Although my friend Matt claims that even Mr. Met is "juicing" ("just look at the size of his head!" he exclaims).

And now, perhaps the most crushing blow. I have to admit that Tenant Leasing Illustrated is not perfect. We are human and have made some mistakes and must apologize to anyone we may have offended or disappointed. We love the game of commercial leasing and are humbled and thrilled to be a part of it. After this admission, we hope to put this matter behind us, once and for all.

Yes, that's right, we have not been completely truthful. We have been telling our readers that tenants must always have the flexibility to pursue legitimate business transactions and that every lease must be structured to allow the tenant to sell its business without landlord consent.

But that steadfast rule does not always apply with restaurant leases. In fact, over the past few years, the trend has been running in the other direction.

Why? Glad you asked.

The main reason is that, with a restaurant, maintaining the tenant's net worth or credit level is not the landlord's only consideration. The character, reputation and "buzz" of the restaurant owner or operator is a critical element in preserving the dignity, class and presentation for which the landlord bargained.

Landlords can be as vain as the rest of us (okay, probably more so) and they can fall in love with the notion of a particularly "hot concept" or celebrity chef in their building. And from a business perspective, the right restaurant can add a certain buzz to a building and improve foot traffic and leasing opportunities.

In addition, if the lease provides for percentage rent (where the landlord shares in a portion of the tenant's gross receipts over an agreed upon breakpoint), then the particular restaurant owner can have a direct effect on the landlord's bottom line.

Landlords also are sensitive that a sale of the restaurant business is in no small part a sale of the real estate, particularly with a restaurant that is doing poorly, in which event the buyer may be paying for the location, especially an under-market location.

Tenants may (and should) argue that the landlord is still getting the rent it bargained for, but this argument gets tougher if, as with many restaurant leases, the tenant has negotiated a longer than usual term (i.e., more than ten years) in order to amortize its build out.

You need to be mindful of these landlord concerns, but also strengthen your position by taking these six performance enhancing approaches:
  • As with any lease, look for the right to assign or sublease in connection with a sale of your business without landlord's consent. Landlords may resist, but your initial position should be no different than with any other lease.
  • If consent is required, hold the landlord to a reasonableness standard. Landlord's will often hold out for a right to unilaterally determine whether your proposed assignee/purchaser is acceptable. This can be a recipe for extortion and should be resisted.
  • Include in the lease specific standards quantifying "reasonable". The more specific you can be as to the required character, experience and financial backing of the assignee/purchaser, the less likely you will end up in a dispute with your landlord. You may need to be practical in eliminating certain categories of assignee/purchasers (e.g., chain restaurants, fast food establishments, etc.) depending on the location of the space and the landlord.
  • Consider providing specific financial incentives for your landlord. Although "key money" can be a dirty phrase, the certainty of knowing that you can freely sell and assign without interference from your landlord may be worth a set payment, a rent bump and/or an increase in the required security deposit.
  • Provide for expedited dispute resolution. With a quick and objective method of dispute resolution, such as expedited arbitration, you will have the opportunity to make your case before a disinterested third party and avoid subjective rejections by your landlord. As we have said before, an expedited dispute resolution method really needs to expedite, particularly with a purchaser that could be lost if it takes too long.
  • Obtain a release from your guaranty and substitution of your purchaser as guarantor, all as part of the assignment/subletting negotiation. Such a release would need to be negotiated up front, and is particularly relevant in the case of a good guy guaranty.
In these days when everyone is looking for an advantage, whether fair or unfair, nobody wants to be under a cloud of suspicion, as when Rosie O'Donnell accused Larry David on Curb Your Enthusiasm of being a "singles hitter" who is suddenly a "power hitter". But you can legitimately bulk up your restaurant assignment/subletting provision if you take note of our six suggestions. As for A Rod, maybe it is not too late to run for NYC Mayor.

About Us


Mintz & Gold prides itself on providing the highest quality legal representation often associated with large law firms with the attention and reasonable costs of a smaller law firm.  Mintz & Gold's Real Estate Department has a national practice specializing in a broad range of commercial real estate law, with a particular focus on commercial leasing. We have extensive experience with respect to office, retail and shopping center leasing, and have represented major Manhattan landlords, national and multinational institutional tenants and national retail chains. Most of our attorneys practiced for many years at large institutional law firms before joining Mintz & Gold.

For more information regarding Mintz & Gold's real estate practice, click here.

For a list of representative transactions of Mintz & Gold's real estate group, click here.

For Mintz & Gold's website, click here.

Alan Katz
Telephone: (212) 696-4848
Fax: (212) 696-1231

You are receiving this newsletter because you signed up to receive it
or are a client, a friend or have worked with us on a prior transaction.
To ensure that you continue to receive emails from us, please add
katz@mintzandgold.com to your address book today.

To subscribe to this newsletter,
send an email with your request to: katznewsletter@mintzandgold.com

Mintz & Gold respects your privacy.
We do not sell, rent, or share your information with anybody,
and will only use your contact data to provide this newsletter.


This newsletter has been prepared for general information purposes only, and is provided with the understanding and subject to the user's agreement that it does not constitute the rendering of legal advice or other professional advice by Mintz & Gold LLP, and does not create any attorney-client or other special relationship. The content of this newsletter may be considered advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. You should not rely upon this newsletter without seeking legal advice from an attorney licensed in the relevant jurisdiction(s). THE CONTENT OF THIS NEWSLETTER IS PROVIDED AS-IS WITH NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. Additionally, the information contained in this newsletter does not constitute tax advice. Any discussion of tax matters contained in this newsletter is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter.

Copyright © 2013 Alan Katz. All rights reserved.

You may reproduce this article by including this copyright and, if reproducing it electronically,
including a link to www.mintzandgold.com.

Newsletter developed by Blue Penguin Development.

No attorneys were harmed in the production of this newsletter.