October 2015
Issue #45



Forward to
a Friend



Sign up for
this Newsletter



See our
Newsletter
Archive




Hello,

Commercial leases are filled with pitfalls and traps for the unwary and tenants should always be looking a few steps ahead to avoid potential trouble. This need for wariness makes New York Mets fans, with expectations of doom in their DNA, natural born commercial tenants.

In today's issue we look at how caution requires that all tenants pay close attention to their lease's subordination provisions.

Sincerely,

Alan Katz
Mintz & Gold LLP 

 

The Amazin's and Subordination

 

The irony of having the New York Mets featured in our October issue is not lost on me.

Strunk and Whites' "The Elements of Style" forbids even using "October" in the same sentence as "NY Mets" (as Casey Stengel would say, "you can look it up").

But I am no bandwagon jumping newbie. I was there for the miserable years and taunting collapses, went to the '69 World Series (watch it, I was in grade school!) and (along with 300,000 other people) the Mookie Wilson/Bill Buckner sixth game of the '86 World Series.

I even still have my Ron Hunt coffee mug.

Mets fans were feeling unusually good this spring and I was no exception, but like any Mets fan with an eight run lead in the ninth inning, I was always ready for the collapse.

True to form, in July the Mets were struggling, David Wright and others were injured, Wilmer Flores was crying, disaster was imminent. After all, as a Mets fan, there is crying in baseball!

But then, faster than you can say "Yoenis Cespedes", the Mets made some nifty trades, their young players stepped up and the team surged, sweeping their rivals the Washington Nationals and vaunting to a nice lead.

So, here it is almost October, the Mets are selling playoff tickets, and I steel myself for inevitable doom.

In commercial leasing, a tenant must also be ready for potential calamity. Sometimes, it is not even the tenant's calamity, but it could become the tenant's problem if not properly protected.

For example, if a landlord defaults under its mortgage or ground lease, its mortgagee or ground lessor can take over the landlord's position under the lease but, since the lease is almost always subordinate by its terms to superior mortgages and ground leases, that mortgagee or ground lessor can choose to terminate the lease.

Even if the lease is not terminated, the subordination language will generally provide that such mortgagee or ground lessor is not subject to all of the obligations of the defaulting landlord (e.g., funding negotiated tenant improvement allowances).

Just like the Phillies in 2007 and 2008. Disaster looming.

The way a tenant protects itself is by obtaining a Subordination Non-disturbance and Attornment agreement or "SNDA".

This is a three-way agreement among the tenant, landlord and mortgagee/ground lessor, which confirms the subordination of the lease to the mortgage or ground lease, requires that the tenant "attorn" or recognize the mortgagee/ground lessor as its landlord once it takes over the lease from the defaulting landlord and provides that the mortgagee/ground lessor will not disturb the tenant's possession subject to the terms of the lease.

SNDAs are not always obtainable, particularly for smaller leases, so tenants need to do a practical analysis of the risks in not obtaining an SNDA. These risks are clearly lessened with an institutional landlord with equity who is not likely to walk away from a valuable property and recognition that mortgagees or ground lessors who inherit defaulted property generally (subject to market conditions) want to maintain the cash flow and recoup their investment, not terminate non-defaulting tenants.

Cover all bases in your subordination provision by addressing the following seven issues:
  • Obtain representations. Your landlord should represent and warrant as to all of the then current mortgagees and ground lessors.
  • Require SNDA up front. You should require an SNDA from each current mortgagee and ground lessor simultaneously with the execution of your lease, with the form of SNDA attached as an exhibit to your lease. Some landlords will try to make the SNDA a post-signing obligation and allow the tenant a termination right if the SNDA is not delivered within some period of time (e.g. 60 or 90 days), but this is likely to be of little value to a tenant that has moved in, commenced construction or invested valuable time.
  • Make the subordination conditional. Ideally, your lease should provide that the subordination itself is subject to your landlord providing an adequate SNDA protecting your rights from all current and future mortgagees/ground lessors. This is generally only possible to obtain for large tenants with a good deal of leverage, and will only be effective with respect to future mortgagees/ground lessors (existing mortgages at the time of the lease will already be recorded and hence superior).
  • Provide a fallback for smaller leases. It is not unusual with smaller leases that your landlord will not agree to obtain the SNDA at the time of lease execution (possibly the mortgagee or ground lessor will not agree or your landlord may be reluctant to inquire). At a minimum, you should require that your landlord make commercially reasonable efforts to obtain an SNDA after lease execution.
  • Be careful about the future SNDA form. Landlords will often require that the SNDA be on the future mortgagee or ground lessor's then standard form. Standard forms of lenders and ground lessors are often extremely one-sided so any such future SNDAs should be "reasonably acceptable" to you or on a form "substantially similar" to the form signed at lease execution.
  • SNDA provisions. Although beyond the scope of this issue (we will discuss the issues to cover in your SNDA itself in a future newsletter - - how's that for gripping suspense!), the SNDA form can be a heavily negotiated document, with the mortgagee/ground lessor looking to limit its obligations once it obtains possession, and the tenant looking to maintain the negotiated terms of its lease. For example, a mortgagee or ground lessor may not be willing to fund an anticipated tenant improvement allowance, but you as tenant may need to be creative and find some other avenue to protect your economic position, such as an offset right against future rent.
  • Avoid strict compliance with mortgage/ground lease terms. You should try to avoid broad covenants to comply with the terms of existing mortgages or ground leases (which can be a way to side step your negotiated non-disturbance or other rights) unless you have reviewed and understand such terms or your landlord represents that compliance with the terms of your lease will constitute the required compliance. Your landlord should also covenant not to amend the mortgage or ground lease terms if it will have more than an insignificant effect on your rights under the lease.
Every twenty years or so, like clockwork, the Mets manage to pull off a fleeting miracle ride that makes our inner Marvelous Marv Throneberry briefly give way to unbridled optimism. Address the seven issues above and you will not need a miracle to ride smoothly through your lease's subordination provisions.



About Us

 

Mintz & Gold prides itself on providing the highest quality legal representation often associated with large law firms with the attention and reasonable costs of a smaller law firm.  Mintz & Gold's Real Estate Department has a national practice specializing in a broad range of commercial real estate law, with a particular focus on commercial leasing. We have extensive experience with respect to office, retail and shopping center leasing, and have represented major Manhattan landlords, national and multinational institutional tenants and national retail chains. Most of our attorneys practiced for many years at large institutional law firms before joining Mintz & Gold.

For more information regarding Mintz & Gold's real estate practice, click here.

For a list of representative transactions of Mintz & Gold's real estate group, click here.

For Mintz & Gold's website, click here.

Contact:
Alan Katz
katz@mintzandgold.com
Telephone: (212) 696-4848
Fax: (212) 696-1231



You are receiving this newsletter because you signed up to receive it
or are a client, a friend or have worked with us on a prior transaction.
To ensure that you continue to receive emails from us, please add
katz@mintzandgold.com to your address book today.

To subscribe to this newsletter,
send an email with your request to: katznewsletter@mintzandgold.com

Mintz & Gold respects your privacy.
We do not sell, rent, or share your information with anybody,
and will only use your contact data to provide this newsletter.

Disclaimer

This newsletter has been prepared for general information purposes only, and is provided with the understanding and subject to the user's agreement that it does not constitute the rendering of legal advice or other professional advice by Mintz & Gold LLP, and does not create any attorney-client or other special relationship. The content of this newsletter may be considered advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. You should not rely upon this newsletter without seeking legal advice from an attorney licensed in the relevant jurisdiction(s). THE CONTENT OF THIS NEWSLETTER IS PROVIDED AS-IS WITH NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. Additionally, the information contained in this newsletter does not constitute tax advice. Any discussion of tax matters contained in this newsletter is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter.

Copyright © 2015 Alan Katz. All rights reserved.

You may reproduce this article by including this copyright and, if reproducing it electronically,
including a link to www.mintzandgold.com.

Newsletter developed by Blue Penguin Development.



No attorneys were harmed in the production of this newsletter.